> I've made things by tweaking `shellpipe` and `makeef` along with a bit
> of scripting.
>
> When opening this I wanted my initial report to be high level. But
> getting into the implementation does Vim have to rely on `tee`? I.E.
> when invoking `:make` could Vim not read and print the errorfile
> itself? This would avoid relying on shell features (which may not be
> portable).
>
> This may also alleviate the need to include a copy of `tee` in Vim's
> source for Windows systems.
You can drop "tee", but then you don't see any progress while make is
busy.
It should be possible to make this work, since tcsh works "out of the
box". An alternative would be to let make write to a file, and the Vim
would need to work like "tail -f" to show the output while it's working.
This does depend on make to flush the output, which would then be a new
problem to solve...
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
28. You have comandeered your teenager's phone line for the net and even his
friends know not to call on his line anymore.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202004262034.03QKYmA4010697%40masaka.moolenaar.net.
