Hi

Attached patch makes those changes to runtime/doc/vim9.txt:

- change " into # in vim9 script examples, since " is not
  valid for comments in vim9
- fixes a typo:  Of -> Or
- make spaces/tabs more consistent in vim9 code examples

Regards
Dominique

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAON-T_hAynKmCnK_Jnxz-qPfsK7o9CpymL8FpQP3%2BbsfVEY0PQ%40mail.gmail.com.
diff --git a/runtime/doc/vim9.txt b/runtime/doc/vim9.txt
index 8eb60be26..63404ceba 100644
--- a/runtime/doc/vim9.txt
+++ b/runtime/doc/vim9.txt
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ There is no "a:" dictionary or "a:000" list.
 
 Variable arguments are defined as the last argument, with a name and have a
 list type, similar to TypeScript.  For example, a list of numbers: >
-  	def MyFunc(...itemlist: list<number>)
+	def MyFunc(...itemlist: list<number>)
 	   for item in itemlist
 	     ...
 
@@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ function or variable the "g:" prefix should be used.  For functions in an
 autoload script the "name#" prefix is sufficient. >
 	def ThisFunction()          # script-local
 	def s:ThisFunction()        # script-local
-	def g:ThatFunction()	    # global
-	def ThatFunction()	    # global if no local ThatFunction()
+	def g:ThatFunction()        # global
+	def ThatFunction()          # global if no local ThatFunction()
 	def scriptname#function()   # autoload
 
 When using `:function` or `:def` to specify a new function inside a function,
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ blocks.  Once the block ends the variable is no longer accessible: >
 	else
 	   let inner = 0
 	endif
-	echo inner  " Error!
+	echo inner  # Error!
 
 The declaration must be done earlier: >
 	let inner: number
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ To intentionally avoid a variable being available later, a block can be used:
 	   let temp = 'temp'
 	   ...
 	}
-	echo temp  " Error!
+	echo temp  # Error!
 
 An existing variable cannot be assigned to with `:let`, since that implies a
 declaration.  Global, window, tab, buffer and Vim variables can only be used
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ isn't that easy.
 Omitting :call and :eval ~
 
 Functions can be called without `:call`: >
-  	writefile(lines, 'file')
+	writefile(lines, 'file')
 Using `:call` is still possible, but this is discouraged.
 
 A method call without `eval` is possible, so long as the start is an
@@ -329,26 +329,26 @@ Notes:
   current function.
 - No line break is allowed in the LHS of an assignment.  Specifically when
   unpacking a list |:let-unpack|. This is OK: >
-  	[var1, var2] =
+	[var1, var2] =
 		Func()
 <  This does not work: >
-  	[var1,
+	[var1,
 	    var2] =
 		Func()
 - No line break is allowed in between arguments of an `:echo`, `:execute` and
   similar commands.  This is OK: >
-  	echo [1,
+	echo [1,
 		2] [3,
 			4]
 <  This does not work: >
-  	echo [1, 2]
+	echo [1, 2]
 		[3, 4]
 - No line break is allowed in the arguments of a lambda, between the "{" and
   "->".  This is OK: >
-  	filter(list, {k, v ->
+	filter(list, {k, v ->
 			v > 0})
 <  This does not work: >
-  	filter(list, {k,
+	filter(list, {k,
 			v -> v > 0})
 
 
@@ -372,11 +372,11 @@ The 'ignorecase' option is not used for comparators that use strings.
 White space ~
 
 Vim9 script enforces proper use of white space.  This is no longer allowed: >
-	let var=234	" Error!
-	let var= 234	" Error!
-	let var =234	" Error!
+	let var=234	# Error!
+	let var= 234	# Error!
+	let var =234	# Error!
 There must be white space before and after the "=": >
-	let var = 234	" OK
+	let var = 234	# OK
 White space must also be put before the # that starts a comment after a
 command: >
 	let var = 234# Error!
@@ -386,14 +386,14 @@ White space is required around most operators.
 
 White space is not allowed:
 - Between a function name and the "(": >
-  	call Func (arg)	   " Error!
-  	call Func
-	     \ (arg)	   " Error!
-  	call Func(arg)	   " OK
-  	call Func(
-	     \ arg)	   " OK
-  	call Func(
-	     \ arg	   " OK
+	call Func (arg)	   # Error!
+	call Func
+	     \ (arg)	   # Error!
+	call Func(arg)	   # OK
+	call Func(
+	     \ arg)	   # OK
+	call Func(
+	     \ arg	   # OK
 	     \ )
 
 
@@ -455,16 +455,16 @@ same time tries to support the legacy Vim commands.  Some compromises had to
 be made.  Here is a summary of what might be unexpected.
 
 Ex command ranges need to be prefixed with a colon. >
-  	->		" legacy Vim: shifts the previous line to the right
-	->func()	" Vim9: method call in continuation line
-	:->		" Vim9: shifts the previous line to the right
+	->		# legacy Vim: shifts the previous line to the right
+	->func()	# Vim9: method call in continuation line
+	:->		# Vim9: shifts the previous line to the right
 
-	%s/a/b		" legacy Vim: substitute on all lines
+	%s/a/b		# legacy Vim: substitute on all lines
 	x = alongname
-	     % another	" Vim9: line continuation without a backslash
-	:%s/a/b		" Vim9: substitute on all lines
-	'text'->func()	" Vim9: method call
-	:'t		" legacy Vim: jump to mark m
+	     % another	# Vim9: line continuation without a backslash
+	:%s/a/b		# Vim9: substitute on all lines
+	'text'->func()	# Vim9: method call
+	:'t		# legacy Vim: jump to mark m
 
 Some Ex commands can be confused with assignments in Vim9 script: >
 	g:name = value  # assignment
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ Vim9 functions are compiled as a whole: >
 	  if !has('feature')
 	    return
 	  endif
-	  use-feature  " May give compilation error
+	  use-feature  # May give compilation error
 	enddef
 For a workaround, split it in two functions: >
 	func Maybe()
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ For a workaround, split it in two functions: >
 	    use-feature
 	  enddef
 	endif
-Of put the unsupported code inside an `if` with a constant expression that
+Or put the unsupported code inside an `if` with a constant expression that
 evaluates to false: >
 	def Maybe()
 	  if has('feature')
@@ -699,8 +699,8 @@ Type inference						*type-inference*
 
 In general: Whenever the type is clear it can be omitted.  For example, when
 declaring a variable and giving it a value: >
-	let var = 0		" infers number type
-	let var = 'hello'	" infers string type
+	let var = 0		# infers number type
+	let var = 'hello'	# infers string type
 
 The type of a list and dictionary comes from the common type of the values.
 If the values all have the same type, that type is used for the list or
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ actually needed.  A recommended mechanism:
    items and any private items. >
 	vim9script
 	let localVar = 'local'
-   	export def FilterFunc(arg: string): string
+	export def FilterFunc(arg: string): string
 	   ...
 <   This goes in .../import/someother.vim.
 
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ the well-known parts of legacy Vim script.
 Since Vim already uses `:let` and `:const` and optional type checking is
 desirable, the JavaScript/TypeScript syntax fits best for variable
 declarations. >
-	const greeting = 'hello'  " string type is inferred
+	const greeting = 'hello'  # string type is inferred
 	let name: string
 	...
 	name = 'John'
@@ -945,12 +945,12 @@ are doing.  Some details are unexpected and can be fixed.  For example how the
 || and && operators work.  Legacy Vim script: >
 	let result = 44
 	...
-	return result || 0	" returns 1
+	return result || 0	# returns 1
 
 Vim9 script works like JavaScript/TypeScript, keep the value: >
 	let result = 44
 	...
-	return result || 0	" returns 44
+	return result || 0	# returns 44
 
 On the other hand, overloading "+" to use both for addition and string
 concatenation goes against legacy Vim script and often leads to mistakes.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui