On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 12:27:18 AM UTC+11 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > This comes from converting a legacy script to Vim9. So the question is > whether it is good to force removing the "s:" prefix or is it more > convenient to let it there?
If s: is never needed in vim9script, it should be an error to include it. As someone learning to use the new system, I want firm guidance—should I include s: or not? If I see it in someone's script, I'm going to wonder if it should be in mine (perhaps there is a performance advantage or something else I don't know about). It wastes everyone's time if arcane syntax is sometimes used. There will never be another opportunity to decide how vim9script should work. John > Message ID: <vim/vim/issues/9724/1033760...@github.com> > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/b3ad01f5-26e0-4e16-adf9-562974069b42n%40googlegroups.com.
