Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > when you say built-in LSP support, do you mean written in C, or as a > > vim9script plugin? > > Written in C. There are plugins but I have heard users argue that it > would be better if it's built-in. Others say that the plugins are good > enough.
Builtin LSP could also be written in Vim9 script I think. I can't think of anything time critical which would benefit being in C. But I'm not sure TBH. Other than that, I don't see support of Tree-Sitter, which could be useful for things like: - syntax highlighting - folding - text objects defined by syntax (to e.g. select or move by function/class/string/statement...) - and probably other things (e.g. being able to show syntax info) Improving spelling would also be nice as Vim only supports a subset of Hunspell and some recent Hunspell file can't be used in Vim anymore (e.g. French dictionary). Not sure if this would be done by improving what currently exists or whether it would be supporting the hunspell lib for example. I recall that Hunspell doc is unfortunately rather dry. Syntax highlighting of Ex command line would be nice (but probably complex for arguable benefit). Regards Dominique -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAON-T_jrUwV2sdYx3VRgQB8HwJm2mfW%3D5RB4A%2Bp%2BJs20c47tDQ%40mail.gmail.com.
