On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 00:23, Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegapp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Doug, > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 7:14 AM Doug Kearns <dougkea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 23:50, Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegapp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> From the email thread > >> https://groups.google.com/g/vim_dev/c/yYpFNUHdRho/m/xjgrKqMoBQAJ?pli=1 > >> and the following items in the todo.txt file: > >> > >> - Change access: public by default, private by prefixing "_". > >> Check for error: can't have the same name twice (ignoring "_" > prefix). > >> > >> This is not yet implemented. We cannot change this after releasing Vim > 9.1. > >> Should we make this change now? > > > > > > I expect this will be an unpopular opinion but I'd strongly consider > releasing 9.1 > > without significant changes to Vim9 script from the 9.0 release. Then > the object model > > could be released with Vim 10. > > > > Once Vim 9.1 is released, we cannot break backward compatibility. > This means that > we cannot change the current accessibility of the object/class members > and methods. > Right, but Vim 9 didn't have classes. Are we beholden to unofficial patch releases? Regards, Doug -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAJ1uvoBdc%2Bx_x38%2B%2BNYRBt3%2BfwEYmC4jJhmK73zNhpARRUXdTw%40mail.gmail.com.
