hi yegappan, 1. first of all, to me the `simple` meant `class` is class like `struct`, I was not like the OOP in vim9script actually, but well that probably would not be accepted by you all now.
2. about the implementation, we've discussed to make class var be default public and only one static keyword. that's another meant `simple`. 3. about the implementation still, now another ticket your proposal class douder methods, that's really something like mixture, if you preferred keyword then how about keyword `new C` for initiation? if you preferred underscore then how about add length()/empty() as another private method? etc. 4. about the `term`, I believe easy way or pre-agreed term before impl and documented it may be better. -- shane.xb.qian -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/OS3P286MB09130819166D6552942914FEEBC6A%40OS3P286MB0913.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
