Hi Christian, On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 2:39 PM Christian Brabandt < vim-dev-git...@256bit.org> wrote:
> That patch would only help, if it makes a list or Dict for options with > several sub-options. > Yes. But that patch can be enhanced to return an option value with several sub-values as a List. > But we would need probably 3 different dicts: for global options, > buffer-local and window-local options. Is it really worth it? > > > I was not very clear on the benefits. So that is why I didn't pursue this PR further. But if this has merits/benefits, this can be implemented. Regards, Yegappan -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAAW7x7%3D_qfD6zfAspZ6jNKKtLpsZRBNEZ8aiva7OQ6xLZh%2Bofg%40mail.gmail.com.
