Hi, On 14.11.2008, at 05:53, Ted Pavlic wrote:
>> Why not play safe and do a clean-room reimplementation. Ted, can you >> just post the list of file extensions here? Converting the list of >> extensions into a patch to the plist file should be matter of 10 >> minutes with python and/or vim macros; I can do that. > > *) Here's the bundle, uncompressed so you can peruse it on-line: > > http://www.tedpavlic.com/examples/mvim/mvim.app > > *) Here's the plist with the file extensions: > > http://www.tedpavlic.com/examples/mvim/mvim.app/Contents/Info.plist > > *) Here are all if the corresponding icons: > > http://www.tedpavlic.com/examples/mvim/mvim.app/Contents/Resources/ As far as I understand (IANAL either), the point of of clean-room implementations is that I don't look at those files. Someone looks at them and then says "Wouldn't it be great if MacVim worked with filetypes .foo, .bar, and .baz?" and then someone else who hasn't seen those files does the change. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design . Ben: Supporting _all_ filetypes from $VIMRUNTIME excessive to me. Nico --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
