On 01/12/08 12:53, anhnmncb wrote: > On 2008-12-01, Tony Mechelynck wrote: >> Isn't it clear that I don't know how to help (and that Bram, Dr.Chip, >> Bill, John and the rest are probably either too busy or equally nonplussed)? >> >> In case you didn't know, if you don't get a reply on this list, it >> usually means that none of those who got your mail (and already got to >> the point of opening it) knew a satisfatory answer. Lost mail may happen >> too but it's rare, and with some mail providers including @gmail.com >> it's even possible to get back the mail that "an over-diligent secretary >> sent to the wastebasket" (and I don't mean a human secretary). >> > Thank you, I'm using usenet proxy to access this list, so if it got lost, I > would not get the reply :) > >
I'm using POP on my @gmail.com account (to which I have set the vim lists to send every message) and from time to time I use the webmail interface to handle spam (recover false positives, report false negatives, and then clear the trash and spam folders until next time). Now and then there is a false positive at gmail but at least (thank ***) there's no firewall or proxy between it and me to delete my mail without my say-so. Best regards, Tony. -- "I'd love to go out with you, but I've been scheduled for a karma transplant." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
