On Wed, 07 Jan 2009, Marvin Renich wrote:
>
> * Tom Link [090107 03:29]:
> >
> > > > Inter-posting (like this) is even better, but harder, and
> > > > (I think) will not be enforced.
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > (but I won't try to promote inter-posting).
> >
> > IIRC there is a rfc about quoting (maybe it's part of the netiquette)
> > and "inter-posting" is widely considered good practice. IMHO the
> > function of a quote is to make clear what you're referring to not to
> > repeat what has been said.
>
> Inter-posting (or interleaved posting) *is* bottom posting[0]. Bottom
> posting is putting the reply after the text to which you are responding.
>
> I was going to expand on this, but the cited reference does a much
> better job.
>
> ...Marvin
>
> [0] http://mailformat.dan.info/quoting/bottom-posting.html
>
>
> >
Then what is the name for *this* type of posting?
--
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
唐詩115 王維 輞川閑居贈裴秀才迪
寒山轉蒼翠 秋水日潺湲 倚杖柴門外 臨風聽暮蟬
渡頭餘落日 墟里上孤煙 復值接輿醉 狂歌五柳前
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
