On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > > On 15/04/09 10:00, Andy Wokula wrote: >> >> Tony Mechelynck schrieb: >>> On 12/04/09 21:29, Matt Wozniski wrote: >>>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: >>>>> On 12/04/09 14:10, Dennis Benzinger wrote: >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> How can I check if there is no search highlighting because of >>>>>> :nohlsearch opposed to :set nohlsearch ? >>>>>> >>>>> I don't think you can. However you can turn it back on by using e.g. >>>>> >>>> No, but IIRC, >>>> >>>> :let @/ = @/ >>>> >>>> should do the trick as well. >>> >>> I tried it before sending that post, and it doesn't. >>> >> The usual way is >> :let&hls =&hls > > Tt, tt. As has already been said, the OP didn't want to know whether the > 'hlsearch' _option_ had been set or cleared, but whether the > :noh[lsearch] _command_ had been used since the latest search. The > command has no effect when the option is unset, but otherwise they are > different things.
Er, right... but Andy didn't reply to the OP, he replied to you (and I) about how to turn back on highlighting after a :nohl ~Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
