Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Wed, September 23, 2009 3:57 pm, Tim Chase wrote: >> It does sound handy since I occasionally lament having some huge >> file open and trying to do a completion in another window, only >> to have vim hang until it's found the mountain of matches in this >> meddlesome buffer. It would be nice to have a per-buffer "ignore >> this for completion" setting that LargeFile.vim could set. > > or add an x-Flag to the completion-Setting, that specifies > patterns/buffers to be excluded from scanning for completion. > (Similar to how the s-flag works.) > > +1 for that feature.
I thought about suggesting something similar to the s-flag, but it would be harder to make use of it in something like the LargeFile.vim plugin. The LF.vim works on a per-buffer basis, while the setting seems better suited to a per-vim-session basis. And it's precisely large files that you'd want to dodge scanning. :) Either way has my +1 as a good idea. -tim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
