On 2010-03-02, Steve Hall wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 23:36 -0500, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > > > > Is the "without Cream" version the Self-installing > > executable? > > Both Windows installers on the Cream download page > > http://cream.sourceforge.net/download.html > > are self-installing versions of gVim. Cream is simply a runtime > configuration that requires a "regular" installation alongside. Even > if you get the wrong installer, default gVim will be available, and > you can't use Cream unless you select it's Start Menu/Desktop icon. > > The only advantage to the non-Cream installer is it's console vim.exe > and related batch files. (Perhaps I should include these in the Cream > version so there's never a problem. Would it be too disturbing for > non-Cream users to have it on disk?)
Are you suggesting that there be just one installer to replace the current Cream and non-Cream installers? If so, what would the Windows Explorer context menu contain? I would think that Cream users would want to be able to select only gvim with Cream and that non-Cream users would want to be able to select only gvim without Cream. Regards, Gary -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
