* 2010-03-29 21:01 (+0100), Antony Scriven wrote: > On 28 March 2010 09:25, Teemu Likonen <tliko...@iki.fi> wrote: >> DISCLAIMER: My tests may suck so I suggest everyone do better ones. >> :-) > > :-). Well I think I should mention that GForth is VM based, or it was > last I looked.
More accurately GForth uses GCC to compile direct or indirect threaded code. > A fast commercial Forth is probably pretty close to the optimised > SBCL. Yes, that's very likely. Here's an old comparison between Forth systems: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/performance.html GForth seems to be the fastest of those which do not produce pure native code. -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php To unsubscribe from this group, send email to vim_use+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.