> You say it "basically" contains the text given. Does something like
> this also show up?
>
> " Only do this when not done yet for this buffer
> if exists("b:did_ftplugin")
> finish
> endif
Yes, in .vim/ftplugin.vim, however, after removing, no change.
> As a side note, are you sure you want "exit" in your "if(&diff)"
> block? This will save and close the buffer. Maybe you want "finish"
> instead?
Thanks, now change, though.
Anyway, I am glad to say I have got a test case now. This case is
based on txt files and foldmethod 'marker' and not on C files and
syntax folding, however seems to address the same issue like in my
original posting.
Since I do not know the policies here if attachements are possible/
allowed, I just paste the files.
(1) Create this new minimal file structure in ~/.
.vim/filetype.vim
.vim/ftplugin/txt.vim
vimrc
demo.txt
(2) filetype.vim contains:
augroup filetypedetect
"au! BufRead,BufNewFile *.txt setfiletype txt
au BufRead,BufNewFile *.txt setfiletype txt
augroup END
(3) txt.vim contains:
setlocal foldmarker={,}
setlocal foldmethod=marker
(4) vimrc:
filetype on
filetype plugin on
set foldmethod=marker
(5) demo.txt
normal text
begin of fold{
content of fold
}
(6) Steps to reproduce:
cd ~
vim -u vimrc
:vsp (vertical split)
:ed demo.txt (file loaded with everything folded = ok)
:Ctrl-W l (switch to right window)
:ed demo.txt (file loaded but folding INACTIVE = not expected)
(7) Additional note:
:set ft? shows nothing in both cases. This differs from the problem in
my original posting, however, the effect is quite similar: Folding
does not work in the other buffer.
If anyone could try tro reproduce, please?
Felix
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
