Hi, Erik Christiansen wrote: > Reply-To: dva...@internode.on.net > In-Reply-To: > <8fc5808f-0fa2-4ad8-bc01-b614c2943...@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:39:43AM -0700, Bee wrote: >> On Mar 16, 12:02 am, Erik Christiansen <dva...@internode.on.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'll try to fly for a while without '2', but will have to change my >>> habits for it to (potentially) work. If it doesn't, I suppose I could >>> try modelines or au, to fudge my way to a working compromise. >> >> Create two mappings to switch: >> >> map <Leader>fon :set fo-=2 fo+=n<cr> >> map <Leader>fo2 :set fo-=n fo+=2<cr> >> >> Or one to toggle: >> >> function! Foo() >> if &fo =~ "2" >> set fo-=2 fo+=n >> else >> set fo-=n fo+=2 >> endif >> endfun >> map <Leader>foo :call Foo()<cr> > > Oooooh! Thank you very much for those. :-) > > While simple mappings normally appeal most, I have F12 as pastetoggle, > and another handy toggle on F11 could be learnt by association. > > After using fo-=2 fo+=n for a day or two, I now have to try to find out > what is causing frequent weirdness when formatting a simple paragraph, > devoid of any digits, and therefore incapable of triggering the current > formatlistpat, IIUC. With: > > formatoptions=croqltn > formatlistpat=^\s*\(\d\|\a\)\+\.\s* > autoindent > textwidth=72 > > Vim now mishandles a gq} performed on: > > » > I couldn't see anything but screw heads when hovering over the last two > photos. (But then I'm arguably GUI dyslexic, possibly due to decades pushing > characters.) > « > > giving this oddly skewed result: > > » > I couldn't see anything but screw heads when hovering over the last two > photos. (But then I'm arguably GUI dyslexic, possibly due to decades > pushing > characters.) > «
the way you have set formatlistpat "photos." is interpreted as the start of an item in a list. You get better results with :set formatlistpat=^\\s*\\(\\d\\+\\\|\\a\\)\\.\\s* Note that I have moved the \+ quantifier to immediately behind \d so that only one or more digits and exactly one letter are allowed as "numbers". Regards, Jürgen -- Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. (Calvin) -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
