On Saturday, May 12, 2012 1:51:14 AM UTC-5, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 11.05.12 13:58, Benjamin Fritz wrote: > > The attached is sort of what I had in mind (the look, not the markup...I > > wrote it by hand from scratch). It has the look from Vim but you're able to > > click on it as you'd expect from a browser. > > The "Current Style" seems perfect. If a user does not want to click on > the current style, then there is no compunction to do so. AIUI, html is > for use with a browser, so TOhtml should provide for that. If a > demonstration is desired, then a demonstration of what is needed for > browsing seems to be the preferred demonstration. Demonstrating something > that is not useful for a browser is of dubious merit, I feel. > > However, each to their own, so is it worth considering a configuration > option to tell TOhtml to generate neutered links when that is what a > user desires? Or add "TOhalf_html" ? >
TOhtml has a lot of options, I'd like to avoid adding more for changes which aren't too jarring. I'm not sure from your statement what you think about links that are: 1. real links 2. normally styled the same as in Vim, i.e. not bright blue and without an underline 3. get a nice blue underline (and maybe text) when ":hover" is active Probably I could add the underline when it has focus as well for those navigating using the keyboard only or other "non-mouse" browser users. Would this be a good compromise or do you want your links to stand out all the time? -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
