On 2012-05-26, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:50:24PM EDT, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2012-05-25, Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> > > There are things I find a little unclear regarding autocommands but
> > > assuming the file extension is something like ‘*.mkdwn’ shouldn't it be
> > > possible to achieve this automatically when creating the file by placing
> > > something like this in a file named ~/.vim/ftdetect/markdown.vim:
> > >
> > > | autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead *.mkdwn set filetype=markdown
> > >
> > > Wouldn't this cause ‘:w myfile.mkdwn’ to automatically enable the
> > > markdown foldexpr and create the folds in one pass?
> >
> > No. BufNewFile will set the filetype to markdown when starting to
> > edit a new file with a name ending in .mkdwn;
>
> That's also how I understood it, yet..
>
> I tested with a markdown file and BufNewFile and BufRead were the only
> two events defined to Vim. Non-customized Vim 7.3, no plugins, etc.
>
> This is what I see in filetype.vim:
>
> " Markdown
> au BufNewFile,BufRead *.markdown,*.mdown,*.mkd,*.mkdn,README.md setf markdown
>
> I started a Vim session by typing ‘vim’ at the prompt and I entered some
> markdown in the [No Name] buffer.
>
> At this point ‘set ft?’ said ‘filetype=’..
>
> Now as soon as I had written the file to disk as ‘sample.mdown’ or
> .mkd.. .mkdn.. etc., ft was correctly set: ‘filetype=markdown’.
>
> so is it the BufNewFile or the BufRead event that causes the filetype to
> be set? Between the two, I would tend to think it is BufNewFile, not
> because the file is written to disk, but rather because the Vim buffer
> now has a name.
>
> I don't know if is meant to work this way (the doc would appear to
> suggest otherwise) but I suspect that the BufNewFile event is also
> triggered when you issue a ‘:w’ command against a scratch buffer.
I don't know what to make of this at this point. After discovering
that I was wrong in my understanding of what happens when you :write
and unnamed buffer to a file, and after reading your posts, I did
some experimenting, too.
I started vim and enabled syntax highlighting and filetype detection,
$ vim -N -u NONE
:syntax enable
entered a bit of markdown text into the buffer, then executed
:set verbosefile=verbose.out
:set verbose=9
and wrote the file:
:w myfile.markdown
As soon as I did that, the markdown headers in the buffer became
highlighted, as we've seen before. Then I quit vim,
:set verbose=0
:q
and opened the verbose.out file. Here are the first 23 lines from
that file.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
chdir(/home/gary)
fchdir() to previous dir
chdir(/home/gary)
fchdir() to previous dir
Executing BufRead Auto commands for "*.markdown"
autocommand setf markdown
Executing FileType Auto commands for "*"
autocommand exe "set syntax=" . expand("<amatch>")
Executing Syntax Auto commands for "*"
autocommand call s:SynSet()
Searching for "syntax/markdown.vim syntax/markdown/*.vim" in
"/home/gary/.vim,/usr/local/share/vim/vimfiles,/usr/local/share/vim/vim73,/usr/local/share/vim/vimfiles/after,/home/gary/.vim/after"
Searching for "/home/gary/.vim/syntax/markdown.vim"
Searching for "/home/gary/.vim/syntax/markdown/*.vim"
Searching for "/usr/local/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax/markdown.vim"
Searching for "/usr/local/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax/markdown/*.vim"
Searching for "/usr/local/share/vim/vim73/syntax/markdown.vim"
chdir(/usr/local/share/vim/vim73/syntax)
...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
It appears that filetype detection was triggered by the BufRead
autocommand! Why on Earth would the BufRead autocommand be
triggered by a :write?
I searched the source code and found the following in the do_write()
function in ex_cmds.c:
/* If 'filetype' was empty try detecting it now. */
if (*curbuf->b_p_ft == NUL)
{
if (au_has_group((char_u *)"filetypedetect"))
(void)do_doautocmd((char_u *)"filetypedetect BufRead",
TRUE);
do_modelines(0);
}
So not all BufRead autocommands are triggered by a :write; only
those in the filetypedetect group.
That behavior still seems strange, but now we know.
Regards,
Gary
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
