On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Xell Liu <xell....@gmail.com> wrote:
> In fact, if your aim is not so strict, i.e. if you only need to > exclude ASCIIs, you could use [^\x00-\xff] . Hope it helps. > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Chris Jones <cjns1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:53:55AM EDT, William Fugy wrote: > > > >> Question: how to match all Chinese chars? > >> > >> ----------------------------------- > >> fenc=utf-16le > >> enc=utf-16le > >> termencoding=utf-16le > >> ------------------------------------ > >> > >> :g/[\%u4e00-\%u9fff]/ > >> this command doesn't work. > >> > >> However > >> :g/\%u5728/ > >> could match a single char '在'.. > >> > >> thanks in advance. > > > > Doesn't work here either even with smaller ranges.. (Vim 7.2 and UTF-8). > > > > Unless s/o comes up with a better idea, you could try using the > > characters themselves instead of their code points but it looks like you > >> > are going to run into another problem.. in my environment, ranges appear >> > Vim 7.3, +multi_lang > to be limited to something like 256+ characters. Beyond that you get an > > ‘E16 Invalid range’ message. > > > > Unless I missed something, and if you absolutely need to do this, you > > could bypass the limitation by breaking up the range like so: > > > >> > | :g/[一-仿伀-俿倀-儀 ... 鼀-龻]/ >> > Good one! i'll give it a try. But so many characters,..... > > > > This corresponds to ranges: > > > > | \u4e00-\u4eff > > | \u4f00-\u4fff > > | \u5000-\u50ff > > | .. > > | \u9f00-\u9fbb¹ > > > > Trouble is, this is going to add up to something like 80+ subranges and > > may cause you to run into other limitations. I haven't tested the whole > > range, only the above (it works here) but if nobody comes up with > >> > a better idea, and you choose go down this path, I would suggest >> > generating the regex programatically.. >> > thank you. Apparently it has just to be done like this way. Now I'm dealing with this problem by Perl. Hope Vim could accomplish it. > > > > CJ > > > >> > ¹ I think \u4e00-\u9fbb is the correct CJK range >> > Yes. it's accurate. > > > > -- > > WE GET SIGNAL > > > > -- > > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
