On 14 December 2012 15:12, shawn wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:32 AM, donothing successfully > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Is it not 96^4 possibilities? A much smaller number: ~85 million. >> > > God, that's not the first time I've messed up basic algebra. […] > Intermediate combinatorics at least.
>> Or you could try to socially engineer yourself, […] so it might >> be worth trying ':X', ':x' or similar. >> > > Modern hardware and brute force would have two symbols done in less > than a second. > If there's an off-the-shelf cracker then that may be faster but a few guesses couldn't do any harm. -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
