On 30.07.13 10:18, RICHARD PITMAN wrote: > Apologies if this is a re-post, I think the first went to the wrong address... > > I have a fortran program in which there are two sorts of numbers, > integers which are simply digits not followed by a period, and double > precision numbers in the form 1.0D0, or more precisely \d\+\.\d\+D\d\+ > I would like to search for the former, avoiding the latter.
When I apply this search: /\v([ \t]|^)[0-9]+\_s to this line: 123 123.0 123. 456 0.123 .123 789 it stops only at each integer. Is that close enough? (It includes leading space. But perhaps \@<= could fix that, if it's important?) I would have expected /\v[ \t^][0-9]+\_s to also match, but '^' isn't working for me as "start of line" in the character class. (It is only as first character in the class (Vim calls that a "collection"), that it would negate the class.) The regex has the benefit of being largely posix, just using vim's \_s as shorthand for (whitespace or EOL). (Most posix implementations have extensions, so why shouldn't vim?) Erik -- In attempting to ride roughshod over 1170 written objections, a local government determination, a resident survey 94% against them, and years of protests, McDonald's is seeking to trash democracy, AFAICT. We do _not_ want them in our hills! BURGER OFF from Tecoma. See: http://www.burgeroff.org/ and www.change.org -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
