On Sunday, December 22, 2013 2:53:38 PM UTC-6, coot_. wrote: > On 05:52 Sat 21 Dec , Brett Stahlman wrote: > > > Possible bugs in new regex engine involving \@> and \? > > > > > > Using the following line of text... > > > 0123456789 > > > > > > ...run the following two :substitute commands with both old and new regex > > engine, and notice the differences... > > > > > > s/\(01\)\(23\)\@>\(.*\)/--\1--\2--\3/ > > > Old (\%=1) > > > --01--23--456789 > > > New (\%=2) > > > ----23--456789 > > > > > > s/\(01\)\(23\d\@=\)\?\(.*\)/--\1--\2--\3/ > > > Old (\%=1) > > > --01--23--456789 > > > New (\%=2) > > > --01----23456789 > > > > > > Note: The \d\@= in the second example could be replaced with other matching > > zero-width assertions (e.g., \%v) without changing the results. > > > > > > Brett S. > > > > Hi, > > > > Which version of vim are you using. I cannot reproduce here (Vim > > 7.4.126, GNU/Linux) the first one, but I can reproduce the second one.
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 (2013 Aug 10, compiled Aug 10 2013 14:38:33) MS-Windows 32-bit GUI version with OLE support Compiled by mool@tororo Big version with GUI. Features included (+) or not (-): Brett S. > > > > Best regards, > > Marcin -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
