On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:08:59 PM UTC+13, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Am 2014-11-10 20:09, schrieb ds26gte: > > This doesn't match shell behavior of ** (for shells that have it, like > > bash). > > Since the behaviour of ** is not standardized and vim is no shell, that > is no argument for or against anything.
I beg to differ on that. Vim is obviously copying functionality that came from shells. > > Even if ~/**/*.ex is deemed to keep the '/', the empty instantiation > > of the ** pattern would give ~//*.ex, which is equivalent to ~/*.ex, > > as consecutive /'s in a path collapse into a single /, even in Vim. I agree. Regards, John Little -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
