On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:46 PM, BPJ <b...@melroch.se> wrote: > Den 2015-10-19 kl. 18:52, skrev Paul: > >> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not >> recognized as spelling error. > > That's because it "is a word" (an expression which I find rather silly) > according to major dictionaries, although labeled archaic by most of > them.[1] For example: > > <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fictious> [...]
This site is accessible only by subscription, however anyone could read definitions for two meanings of the word (both flagged as "obsolete") at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fictious Best regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
