I am creating an operator mapping that sets the selection register based on the user's motion. e.g. =*iW to search for the current cWORD and stuff like that.
I would very much like to be able to set v:searchforward as part of this, but it's not clear how I can do this. Per :h function-search-undo, any value assigned to v:searchforward inside of a function is undone when the function returns. I can work around this most of the time, but not when doing an operator function using g@. The mapping is implemented essentially like this: nmap <silent> =* :<C-U>set operatorfunc=SetSearchPattern<CR>g@ This function sets the search pattern @/ and does a couple of other things. If I set v:searchforward inside it, the assignment is ignored. I have other mappings that invoke this function then set v:searchforward in a separate exec statement: vmap <silent> z* :call SetSearchFromSelection(visualmode())<CR>:let v:searchforward = 1<CR> vmap <silent> z# :call SetSearchFromSelection(visualmode())<CR>:let v:searchforward = 0<CR> But I don't know how to do this in conjunction with g@, since what comes after g@ is interpreted as a motion. Any suggestions for how I can get around this restriction? -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
