On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 14:37, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote:
> It looks like you run into the false-positive fortify check. > Although the build log mentiones -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 it behaves like a > higher fortify level was used. Thanks for your input Bram. I wanted to make a couple of checks before getting back you. In pkgsrc, as default we have: PKGSRC_USE_FORTIFY?= strong As explained here: http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/mk/defaults/mk.conf PKGSRC_USE_FORTIFY?= strong # Turns on substitute wrappers for commonly used functions that do not bounds # checking regularly, but could in some cases. This is effectively in use only # when both enabled and supported. # Possible values: # no: Do not pass any flags for FORTIFY # weak: Pass -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 # strong: Pass -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 # Default: strong I have rebuilt with PKGSRC_USE_FORTIFY?=weak and this seems to produce an installation that doesn't crash. I've passed this information to pkgsrc-users and the editors/vim package maintainer. Thanks for you assistance. -- Ottavio Caruso -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/CAEJNuHwiYMzGNxGMAnPzed8jQY1tKOUkE4T39exLcdpiCJ55EA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
