On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 2:21 AM Christian Brabandt <cbli...@256bit.org> wrote:
> Hi Salman, > > I don't see what would be the benefit of having individual patches on > individual benefits. It's true, we only use a linear history with a > single branch master. You can easily checkout individual patches using > tags, e.g. git checkout v9.1.0591 Then you can use git bisect with those > tags, e.g. git checkout master && git bisect bad && git checkout > v9.1.0500 && git bisect good and then follow gits advise to checkout > individual commits, build vim and verify the good or bad behaviour. > I read what I had written a second time and you're right, I said 'branch' when I meant to say 'tag'. > > The issue was also recently reported at > https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/15370 and fixed by > https://github.com/vim/vim/releases/tag/v9.1.0634 > > Do you still need to know the patch that introduced it in the first place or are we past that now? Thank you, Salman -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/CANuxnEfe9Fox%3D_c4ECUKYjnYfO%3DtbgNU8z5V144zdKQ3%3Dr6doA%40mail.gmail.com.
