En/Je/On 2013-05-06 15:41, Hannes Schüller escribió / skribis / wrote : > Marcos Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > { "zoomin", zoom,{ZoomIn | ZoomText} }, > > > > { "zoomout",zoom,{ZoomOut | ZoomText} }, > > > > { "zi",zoom,{ZoomIn | ZoomText} }, > > > > { "zo",zoom,{ZoomOut | ZoomText} } > > Thinking about this, I'd say it might be a good idea to have one > command for zooming just text (as above) and one for zooming the > complete page (i.e. including images) as well for full flexibility.
It's a good idea. > Would it be clear enough (documented, of course) to have zi/zo zoom > just the text and zoomin/zoomout to zoom the complete page? If "zoomin"/"zi" and "zoomout"/"zo" were used that way, it would be easy to forget which command does what, especially if they're not used everyday. I think "zoomin" and "zoomout" are clear enough for zooming the whole page, since, by default, zooming means zooming everything. "zoominpage" and "zoomoutpage" would be clearer forms, but unnecessary. As for text, I suggest "zoomtextin" and "zoomtextout". I think commands that are easier to remember and easier to understand in the config file are more preferable than ambiguous abbreviations. The commands' length is not a problem, thanks to tab completion and keyboard mapping. Marcos -- http://programandala.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Vimprobable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vimprobable-users
