--- Charles Shannon Hendrix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Does your Mac IIci have parity?  Mine was
> manufactured in 1992.

Nope. It doesn't have the parity chip on the side
of the SIMM slots opposite the drives.

If you could lay hands on an AT power supply, 386SX
motherboard (not the 386DX), a cheapo ISA videocard
and monitor, then you'd have a simple testbed to
check out the SIMMs a pair at a time. That works
because the 386SX only has a 16 bit memory bus.
If you could dig up a 286 with SIMM slots (pretty
rare and can't be an IBM PS/2 cuz they use special
RAM) you could test them one at a time.

Any Mac that'll take 30 pin SIMMs in pairs instead
of requiring groups of four? (The classic won't do
because it won't take anything bigger than 1meg on the
expansion card.)

=====
"Truth is, after all, a stronger edifice than a lie.  An empire may be built on lies, 
but it only takes a single truth to crumble it." Jumba the Wise Lizard

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus – Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

-- 
Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
 -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>



---------------------------------------------------------------
>The Think Different Store
http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com
---------------------------------------------------------------


  • Re: J. S. Garrison
    • Re: Charles Shannon Hendrix
      • Re: Gregg Eshelman
        • Re: Charles Shannon Hendrix
          • Re: Gregg Eshelman
            • Re: Charles Shannon Hendrix
            • Re: the pickle
          • Re: the pickle
            • Re: Charles Shannon Hendrix

Reply via email to