Net neutrality repeal means your internet may never be the same
The FCC is about to pull the rug out from under Obama-era rules on net
neutrality. That could be just the start of a whole new internet experience
for you.
November 22, 2017 8:42 AM PST
 
In May, protesters spoke up after FCC Chairman Ajit Pai introduced his
proposal to roll back net neutrality rules. 
Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images 
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai wants the US government to stop "micromanaging the
internet."
On Tuesday he introduced a proposal to repeal the controversial 2015 net
neutrality rules that prevented broadband companies from blocking or slowing
down access to websites or services. 
While many people agree with the basic principles of net neutrality, these
specific rules have been a lightning rod for controversy.  That's because in
order to get the rules to hold up in court, the FCC reclassified broadband
networks so that they fell under the same strict regulations that govern
telephone networks.
Pai has called the Obama-era rules "heavy-handed" and "a mistake," and he
argues that they've deterred innovation and depressed investment in building
and expanding broadband networks. To set things right, he says, he's taking
the FCC back a "light touch" approach to regulation. 
A draft copy of Pai's repeal proposal (PDF) was released to the public on
Wednesday. Don't feel like you have to plow through all the bureaucratic and
technical complexities to get a handle on the situation. We've assembled
this FAQ to put everything in plain English. 
What is net neutrality again?
Net neutrality is the principle that all traffic on the internet should be
treated equally, regardless of whether you're checking Facebook, posting
pictures to Instagram or streaming movies from Netflix or Amazon. It also
means that companies like AT&T, which is trying to buy Time Warner, or
Comcast, which owns NBC Universal, can't favor their own content over a
competitor's content. 
So what just happened?
Pai, who became FCC chairman after President Trump took office, on Tuesday
published a proposal to eliminate the current net neutrality regulations,
which prohibit broadband providers from blocking or slowing down traffic and
ban them from offering so-called fast lanes to companies willing to pay
extra to reach consumers more quickly than competitors. 
But the proposal's most significant change is to strip the FCC of its
authority to regulate broadband and instead shift that responsibility to the
Federal Trade Commission. Under the 2015 rules, the FCC reclassified
broadband as a utility, which gave it the authority to regulate broadband
infrastructure much as it did the old telephone network. The proposal would
strip away that classification. 
Does this mean no one will be policing the internet?
Pai hopes internet service providers will publicly commit to putting "no
blocking" and "no throttling" commitments in their terms of service. That
would make these actions enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission, which
can take action against companies that violate contracts with consumers or
that participate in anticompetitive and fraudulent activity.
Is the FTC equipped to make sure broadband companies don't harm consumers?
Yes and no. The FTC already oversees consumer protection and competition for
the whole economy. But this also means the agency is swamped. And because
the FTC isn't focused exclusively on the telecommunications sector, it's
unlikely the agency can deliver the same kind of scrutiny that the FCC
would. 
More importantly, the FTC also lacks the FCC's rulemaking authority. This
means FTC enforcement extends only to companies' voluntary public
commitments or violations of antitrust law. Unless broadband and wireless
carriers commit in writing to basic net neutrality principles, the FTC can
only enforce antitrust issues, which must meet a high legal standard. 
What about internet fast lanes? Will the FCC ask companies to voluntarily
commit to not offering paid prioritization?
No, the FCC proposal removes the ban that keeps a service provider from
charging an internet service, like Netflix or YouTube, a fee for delivering
its service faster to customers than competitors can. Net neutrality
supporters argue that this especially hurts startups, which can't afford
such fees.  
But Pai believes the current rules are too restrictive. He wants to make
sure broadband companies can experiment with different business models, such
as offering more zero-rated deals, which allow companies to give away
content for free without it counting against a customer's monthly data cap.
Another potential business model would allow a broadband provider to give
priority to a medical application or to services like those enabling
self-driving cars. 
Does the proposal leave any of the old rules in place?
The one rule that was spared is the so-called "transparency rule," which
requires broadband providers to disclose how they manage their networks. The
new proposal will try to expand this requirement. The FCC wants internet
service providers to commit to disclosing when and under what circumstances
they block or slow traffic and to disclose if and when they offer paid
priority services. 
What's it all mean for me?
This is a huge change in policy at the FCC and it could affect how you
experience the internet. Whether that experience is changed for the better
or for the worse depends on whom you believe. 
Pai and many other Republicans say freeing up broadband providers from
onerous and outdated regulation will let them invest more in their networks.
They're hopeful this will lead to more expansion in rural and
hard-to-service areas of the country, as well as faster speed service
throughout the US. The agency's argument for repealing the rules is that
investment started to decline in 2015 after the rules were adopted. 
But Democrats like Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii, consumer advocacy groups,
civil rights organizations and technology companies like Google and Mozilla
say that repealing the 2015 rules and stripping the FCC of its authority
will lead to broadband companies controlling more of your internet
experience. 
As companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast acquire more online content like
video, they could give their own services priority on their networks,
squeezing out competitors and limiting what you could access. This might
mean fewer startups get a shot at becoming the next Facebook, Netflix or
YouTube. Ultimately, it could lead to your internet experience looking more
like cable TV, where all the content is curated by your provider. 
Some critics also fear this control could lead to higher prices. And groups
such as the ACLU say it could affect your First Amendment right to free
speech as big companies control more of what you experience online. 
"Internet rights are civil rights," said Jay Stanley, an ACLU senior policy
analyst. "Gutting net neutrality will have a devastating effect on free
speech online. Without it, gateway corporations like Comcast, Verizon and
AT&T will have too much power to mess with the free flow of information."
What's next?
The FCC is scheduled to vote on the proposal at its Dec. 14  meeting. And
since Republicans lead the agency with 3 votes to 2, it will easily pass.
But that's not the end of the fight. Net neutrality supporters have vowed to
file lawsuits in defense of net neutrality. Once the order to repeal the
rules is published in the federal registry, the lawsuits will likely be
filed. Supporters say they feel good about their chances in court, given
that a federal appeals court last year upheld the 2015 rules. But as with
any legal fight, the outcome is never certain until the judges make their
ruling. 
Will Congress take action?
Even though internet service providers may be dancing a jig now over their
good fortune to have the FCC rules repealed, if a Democrat is elected to the
White House in 2020, the rules could flip back the other way and be
reinstated. 
Obviously, this ping-ponging is not good for anyone. For this reason, people
on both sides of the issue have called for Congress to take action and amend
the Communications Act to codify net neutrality protections. Republicans
have offered proposals, but Democrats have balked because they say the
legislation would further strip the FCC of authority. 
That said, Schatz is working to introduce legislation to protect net
neutrality. So stay tuned. 
Is there anything I can do?
At this point, the repeal is going to happen. But net neutrality supporters
say it's important to reach out to your elected officials to tell them
you're concerned and to urge them to pass bipartisan legislation. Schatz
also said that anybody who cares about this issue, including the thousands
of people who filed comments to the FCC urging protection for the net
neutrality rules, need to turn that concern into action. Midterm elections
for Congress are coming up in 2018, and Schatz wants to see tech-savvy young
people making the internet a campaign issue.  
The Smartest Stuff: Innovators are thinking up new ways to make you, and the
things around you, smarter.
Holiday Gift Guide: CNET's full gift guide, including dozens of products
priced under $25, $50 and $100.
87 Comments 

Original Article at:
https://www.cnet.com/news/net-neutrality-fcc-2017-repeal-what-it-means/#ftag
=CAD-09-10aai5b


-- 
The following information is important for all members of the V iPhone list.

If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you 
feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or 
moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.

Your V iPhone list moderator is Mark Taylor.  Mark can be reached at:  
mk...@ucla.edu.  Your list owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at 
caraqu...@caraquinn.com

The archives for this list can be searched at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to