Reminds me of O2 being trademarked by a telco here.... appearing in science and chemistry books since the year Dot. Though Basmati rice was also trademarked in the US hwen the rice they sold had nothing to do with basmati or however it's spelled.
Thisis all about as emotive and stupid as a good deal of the political correctness crap we have to wade through. Our disability forms have terms like blind and severely blind now and will be assessed (by sighted) on those premises. Almost as bad as legally (or illegally) blind over there. Rh. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Ventura" <frank.vent...@littlebreezes.com> To: <viphone@googlegroups.com> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 7:29 AM Subject: Re: VoiceOver threatened by Samsung Wow, if I am reading this correctly Samsung's claim is that tripple clicking a button to turn VO on or off violates its patents. So they're saying that pressing a button to turn on a feature is patented? Now that's kind of broad isn't it? Of course, there is so much more at stake here. Apple has accessibility onboard to maintain educational and government contracts. Take that away from them and you can really drive a stake through Apple's heart. And, doing it in a German court, largely off of the radar screen of most US consumers is really pretty sneaky. Frank Ventura Email: frank.vent...@littlebreezes.com<mailto:frank.vent...@littlebreezes.com> Voicemail: 781 492-4262 Imessage: frankmvent...@mac.com<mailto:frankmvent...@mac.com> *Sent from my Mac Book Air* On Feb 23, 2013, at 1:55 AM, David Chittenden <dchitten...@gmail.com<mailto:dchitten...@gmail.com>> wrote: Subject: VoiceOver threatened by Samsung Reply-To: Blind Democracy Discussion List <blind-democr...@octothorp.org<mailto:blind-democr...@octothorp.org>> Even if Samsung does not succeed in their action, the very fact they've even tried it guarantees I will never buy a Samsung product. And to think Samsung was instrumental in establishing the guide dog school in Korea. Unconscionable. Alice Samsun g struggles to block iPhone function for the blindBy Leo Kelion Technology reporter The VoiceOver function is designed to help blind and partially sighted consumers use the iPhone Samsung has suffered a setback in its effort to win an iPhone ban based on a function making its software accessible to blind people. The South Korean firm had sought an injunction in a German court arguing Apple's VoiceOver screen-access facility infringed one of its patents. However, the judge has ordered the case to be suspended pending another ruling that could invalidate Samsung's claim. Disability campaigners had expressed concern about the case. Apple's VoiceOver function is used by blind and partially-sighted people to hear a description of what the iPhone is showing by touching its screen. The software covers text and icons including audio descriptions of the battery level and network signal. It also allows the phones to be operated via Braille-based add-ons. Samsung had argued that Apple had failed to licence a patent it owned which describes pressing a button to make a handset describe its display. The basis for this was that VoiceOver could be switched on by triple-clicking the iPhone's home button. Apple declined to comment. A statement from Samsung said: "For decades, we have heavily invested in pioneering the development of technological innovations in the mobile industry, which have been constantly reflected in our products. "We continue to believe that Apple has infringed our patented mobile technologies, and we will continue to take the measures necessary to protect our intellectual property rights." 'Regrettable in the extreme' Patent consultant Florian Muller, who was first to report the Mannheim Court's decision, questioned Samsung's tactics. "If Samsung had only requested monetary compensation in this action, it would have made a much better choice than by trying to achieve, through the pursuit of an injunction, the deactivation or (more realistically) degradation of the voiceover functionality Apple provides to its German customers," he wrote on his blog. The British Computer Association of the Blind said it was worried such an important feature might be threatened. "A lack of access to information is arguably the biggest potential barrier to inclusion in society for blind and partially-sighted people," a spokesman told the BBC. "If something as important as access to telephone technology had been blocked by the actions of one company over another the consequences for blind people everywhere would be regrettable in the extreme." The Wall Street Journal's AllThingsD tech site was more damning. "Leaving aside the ethics of asserting a patent against a feature designed to help the blind, this is unwise," wrote John Paczkowski. "It's the PR equivalent of punching yourself in the face. Samsung has now identified itself as a company willing to accept the loss of accessibility for the vision-impaired as collateral damage in its battle with Apple." Apple and Samsung have fought a number of patent cases against each other in courts across the world. The biggest award involved a US jury ordering Samsung to pay Apple $1.05bn (£688m) in damages. The judge in the case later rejected Apple's call for the sum to be increased and a sales ban on some Samsung handsets. _______________________________________________ Blind-Democracy mailing list blind-democr...@octothorp.org<mailto:blind-democr...@octothorp.org> http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google Group. To search the VIPhone public archive, visit http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/. To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com<mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com>. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VIPhone" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google Group. To search the VIPhone public archive, visit http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/. To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VIPhone" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google Group. To search the VIPhone public archive, visit http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/. To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VIPhone" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
