On 04/14/2011 10:22 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 04/14/2011 02:05 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
The goal of the virtlib library is to extract from Virt Manager and
Virt Manager TUI the shared business logic and package it separately
as a reusable library of code.
Just to be clear, a reusable _private_ library of code for tools in the
virt-manager umbrella. There isn't any benefit to making this library
public at the moment. As far as the code is concerned I assume it
shouldn't make a difference (that said I haven't looked at the code yet).
Wouldn't virtmanagerlib be a more appropriate name? If this ever goes
public I imagine the names virtlib vs. libvirt will cause a lot of
confusion in discussions.
Regards,
Dennis
_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
