On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:06:13AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/29/2011 09:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:55:11PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <[email protected]> > >> > >> This is the generic family this OS belongs to, for example Linux, Windows, > >> Solaris, UNIX etc. > > >> @@ -35,6 +38,7 @@ > >> <short-id>openbsd4</short-id> > >> <name>OpenBSD 4</name> > >> <version>4.9</version> > >> + <family>UNIX</family> > >> <vendor>OpenBSD Project</vendor> > >> > >> <devices> > > > > Perhaps we should let BSD have a family of 'BSD' ? > > And if we do that, would we classify MacOS as BSD?
No, I would treat OS-X as a separate family. > Also, is MirBSD in the list of known OS yet? I have successfully > installed that BSD flavor in a VM in the past. I don't believe so. This list is far from complete. So far we're just trying to replicate the info that is hardcoded in virt-install python modules. When that's all working nicely, we can pick up other OS too and users will be able to customize the DB locally too Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
