2017-09-21 14:02 GMT+02:00 Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com>: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > > The man page spice-gtk ships is named "spice-client", not "spice-gtk" > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477966 > > > --- > > > man/virt-viewer.pod | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/man/virt-viewer.pod b/man/virt-viewer.pod > > > index 8463eb4..9ea5fb8 100644 > > > --- a/man/virt-viewer.pod > > > +++ b/man/virt-viewer.pod > > > @@ -223,6 +223,6 @@ to the extent permitted by law. > > > > > > =head1 SEE ALSO > > > > > > -C<virsh(1)>, C<virt-manager(1)>, C<spice-gtk(1)>, the project website > C<http://virt-manager.org> > > > +C<virsh(1)>, C<virt-manager(1)>, C<spice-client(1)>, the project > website C<http://virt-manager.org> > > > > I was wondering what man page this is until I found it was in the > > spice-gtk RPM, not spice-gtk3. The spice-gtk RPM seems entirely > > pointless to me - it used to contain the GTK2 build but thats now > > gone - can we just put the man page in spice-gtk3 RPM and kill > > the spice-gtk RPM entirely > > Yup, that was also my feeling when finding the doc-only spice-gtk > package :) >
I agree, is it in Fedora? el7 has just spice-gtk3 rpm Pavel > > Christophe > > _______________________________________________ > virt-tools-list mailing list > virt-tools-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list >
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list