On 11/04/2011 07:36 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Hello, > I'm going to test nested virtualization on Intel with F16 host. > I have used it successfully with Amd, where it is enabled by default > in its kvm-amd module. > Based on > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/virtual/kvm/nested-vmx.txt > and > F16 having now > [root@f16 ~]# uname -r > 3.1.0-7.fc16.x86_64 > and the same confirmations in its kernel-doc > /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-3.1.0/Documentation/virtual/kvm/nested-vmx.txt > file > > In F15: > # uname -r > 2.6.40.6-0.fc15.x86_64 > # modinfo kvm-intel > ... > parm: bypass_guest_pf:bool > parm: vpid:bool > parm: flexpriority:bool > parm: ept:bool > parm: unrestricted_guest:bool > parm: emulate_invalid_guest_state:bool > parm: vmm_exclusive:bool > parm: yield_on_hlt:bool > parm: ple_gap:int > parm: ple_window:int > > In F16 indeed we have now: > # modinfo kvm-intel > ... > parm: vpid:bool > parm: flexpriority:bool > parm: ept:bool > parm: unrestricted_guest:bool > parm: emulate_invalid_guest_state:bool > parm: vmm_exclusive:bool > parm: yield_on_hlt:bool > parm: nested:bool > parm: ple_gap:int > parm: ple_window:int > > Based on docs, the "nested" option is disabled by default on Intel > (and probably not changed in Fedora?) > Did anyone already enable it and test nested virtualization > functionalities on Intel during F16 Beta/RC cycle and has now results > to share?
Not that I know of. But it be interesting to test it. Also would be nice if you could share your results/experience. Will give this a shot sometime over the next week. /kashyap > thanks in advance, > Gianluca > _______________________________________________ > virt mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt _______________________________________________ virt mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt
