On 13/09/2016 11:54, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > OK, I agree with you :) But if we support multiple backends, can > > we keep cryptodev-linux module as one option? > > I'm personally against any support for out of tree kernel modules > in QEMU, regardless of whether QEMU also implements alternative > backends, unless there is a strong sign that the module in question > is on the verge of being accepted into mainline Linux. That does > not seem to be the case there - mainline settled on AF_ALG as the > only supported approach AFAICT.
Is there any reason to embed knowledge of AF_ALG directly in QEMU, rather than delegating that to gcrypt/nettle? Paolo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
