On 2018-06-19 21:12:17 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:54:06PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote: > > On 2018-06-19 20:30:06 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:32:28AM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote: > > > > Add VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_GROUP_ID_CFG (Group Identifier) capability to the > > > > virtio PCI capabilities to allow for the grouping of devices. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Venu Busireddy <venu.busire...@oracle.com> > > > > --- > > > > content.tex | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex > > > > index 7a92cb1..7ea6267 100644 > > > > --- a/content.tex > > > > +++ b/content.tex > > > > @@ -599,6 +599,8 @@ The fields are interpreted as follows: > > > > #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_DEVICE_CFG 4 > > > > /* PCI configuration access */ > > > > #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG 5 > > > > +/* Group Identifier */ > > > > +#define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_GROUP_ID_CFG 6 > > > > \end{lstlisting} > > > > > > > > Any other value is reserved for future use. > > > > @@ -997,6 +999,47 @@ address \field{cap.length} bytes within a BAR range > > > > specified by some other Virtio Structure PCI Capability > > > > of type other than \field{VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG}. > > > > > > > > +\subsubsection{Group Identifier capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport > > > > Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Group Identifier > > > > capability} > > > > + > > > > +The VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_GROUP_ID_CFG capability provides means for grouping > > > > devices together. > > > > + > > > > +The capability is immediately followed by an identifier of arbitrary > > > > size as below: > > > > + > > > > +\begin{lstlisting} > > > > +struct virtio_pci_group_id_cap { > > > > + struct virtio_pci_cap cap; > > > > + u8 group_id[]; /* Group Identifier */ > > > > +}; > > > > +\end{lstlisting} > > > > + > > > > +The fields \field{cap.bar}, \field{cap.length}, \field{cap.offset} > > > > +and \field{group_id} are read-only for the driver. > > > > + > > > > +The specification does not impose any restrictions on the size or > > > > +structure of group_id[]. > > > > > > I think it must be a multiple of 4 in size, as is > > > standard for all capabilities. > > > > Sure. Would rephrasing it as below suffice? > > > > The specification does not impose any restrictions on the size or > > structure of group_id[], except that the size must be a multiple of 4. > > > > > > > > > > > > Vendors > > Devices
Will correct it in the next version. > > > are free to declare this array as > > > > +large as needed, as long as the combined size of all capabilities can > > > > +be accommodated within the PCI configuration space. > > > > + > > > > +If there is enough room in the PCI configuration space to accommodate > > > > +the group identifier, the fields \field{cap.bar}, \field{cap.offset} > > > > +and \field{cap.length} should be set to 0. > > > > + > > > > +If there isn't enough room, some or all of the group identifier can be > > > > +presented in the BAR region, in which case the fields \field{cap.bar}, > > > > +\field{cap.offset} and \field{cap.length} should be set appropriately. > > > > > > And then how do you glue the two pieces? > > > > How the user glues them up is up to the user. The specification should > > not impose rules on that, right? > > We need to define how these are matched. > Let's assume device A has it all in config space, device B > has part in memory. How would we compare them? I will go with your suggestion below, and hence, this becomes obsolete. > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > +In either case, the field \field{cap.cap_len} indicates the length of > > > > +the group identifier information present in the configuration space > > > > +itself. > > > > > > It seems like an overkill to me. Isn't it enough to have it in config > > > space? This would make comparisons easier. > > > > I was trying to make the proposal permissive for expansion, in case > > the user needs the size to be larger than what can be accommodated in > > the config space. Would you like me to restrict that the capability be > > entirely present in the config space? I am fine with it. Please confirm, > > and I will change it so. > > I think so, yes. Sure. I will revise the specification as above in the next version. Thanks, Venu > > > > > > > > + > > > > +\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Group Identifier capability}{Virtio > > > > Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Group > > > > Identifier capability} > > > > + > > > > +The device MAY present the VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_GROUP_ID_CFG capability. > > > > + > > > > +\drivernormative{\paragraph}{Group Identifier capability}{Virtio > > > > Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Group > > > > Identifier capability} > > > > + > > > > +The driver MUST NOT write to group_id[] area or the BAR region. > > > > + > > > > \subsubsection{Legacy Interfaces: A Note on PCI Device > > > > Layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI > > > > Device Layout / Legacy Interfaces: A Note on PCI Device Layout} > > > > > > > > Transitional devices MUST present part of configuration > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org