On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:59:13PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:48:58 +0300 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 06:06:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > In any case, I'm not sure anymore why we'd want the extra uuid. > > > > It's mostly so we can have e.g. multiple devices with same MAC > > (which some people seem to want in order to then use > > then with different containers). > > > > But it is also handy for when you assign a PF, since then you > > can't set the MAC. > > > > OK, so what about the following: > > - introduce a new feature bit, VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY_UUID that indicates > that we have a new uuid field in the virtio-net config space > - in QEMU, add a property for virtio-net that allows to specify a uuid, > offer VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY_UUID if set > - when configuring, set the property to the group UUID of the vfio-pci > device > - in the guest, use the uuid from the virtio-net device's config space > if applicable; else, fall back to matching by MAC as done today > > That should work for all virtio transports.
True. I'm a bit unhappy that it's virtio net specific though since down the road I expect we'll have a very similar feature for scsi (and maybe others). But we do not have a way to have fields that are portable both across devices and transports, and I think it would be a useful addition. How would this work though? Any idea? -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
