On 2018-06-28 05:14:50 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 06:07:59PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
> > On 2018-06-26 23:08:12 -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
> > > On 2018-06-27 07:02:36 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:49:33PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
> > > > > Add the "Vendor-Specific" capability to the Red Hat PCI bridge device
> > > > > "pci-bridge", to contain the "Group Identifier" (UUID) that will be
> > > > > used to pair a virtio device with the passthrough device attached to
> > > > > that bridge.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This capability is added to the bridge iff the "uuid" option is 
> > > > > specified
> > > > > for the bridge.
> > > > 
> > > > I think the name should be more explicit. How about "failover-group-id"?
> > > 
> > > I can change it. But don't you think it is bit long?
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Venu Busireddy <venu.busire...@oracle.com>
> > > > 
> > > > I'd like to also tweak the device id in this case,
> > > > to make it easier for guests to know it's a grouping bridge.
> > > 
> > > Could you please recommend a name for the new ID'd definition? Something
> > > in lines of PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_<blah blah>.
> > 
> > How about these names and values for the device IDs?
> > 
> >   PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_PCI_BRIDGE_GRP (0x0010) for pci-bridge, and 
> 
> You do not need the second PCI, and group is one of the
> functions of bridge anyway.
> 
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_BRIDGE_FAILOVER?

Sounds good.

> >   PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_PCIE_BRIDGE_GRP (0x0011) for pcie-downstream
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Venu
> 
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_DOWNPORT_FAILOVER?

Sounds good.

> It's becoming annoying though - we'll need one for each type :(
> 
> Ideas/options:
> - use revision ID to distinguish from regular bridge

What would we use for the revision? For example, "pci-bridge" (default
one) currently uses revision 0. Should we use revision 1 for the group
bridge? If we do that, what if in the future we need to up the revision
for the default bridge?

> - use device serial # cap for the bridge when it's an express device

We could do that. But if we are defining a new Device ID for the PCI
case, we might as well do so for the PCIe case too, and be consistent?
The other advantage in defining a new ID is, 'lspci' could right away
tell what type of bridge it is (if we update PCI IDs). No need to map
the revision to a bridge type!

Unless you have strong reservations against, I think the notion of
different Device ID for the grouping bridge sounds cleaner. Do you agree?

Venu

> 
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c |  8 ++++++++
> > > > >  hw/pci/pci_bridge.c            | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  include/hw/pci/pcie.h          |  1 +
> > > > >  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c 
> > > > > b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
> > > > > index b2d861d216..bbbc6fa1c6 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_bridge_dev.c
> > > > > @@ -71,6 +71,12 @@ static void pci_bridge_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, 
> > > > > Error **errp)
> > > > >          bridge_dev->msi = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
> > > > >      }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +    err = pci_bridge_vendor_init(dev, 0, errp);
> > > > > +    if (err < 0) {
> > > > > +        error_append_hint(errp, "Can't init group ID, error %d\n", 
> > > > > err);
> > > > > +        goto vendor_cap_err;
> > > > > +    }
> > > > > +
> > > > >      err = slotid_cap_init(dev, 0, bridge_dev->chassis_nr, 0, errp);
> > > > >      if (err) {
> > > > >          goto slotid_error;
> > > > > @@ -109,6 +115,7 @@ slotid_error:
> > > > >      if (shpc_present(dev)) {
> > > > >          shpc_cleanup(dev, &bridge_dev->bar);
> > > > >      }
> > > > > +vendor_cap_err:
> > > > >  shpc_error:
> > > > >      pci_bridge_exitfn(dev);
> > > > >  }
> > > > > @@ -162,6 +169,7 @@ static Property pci_bridge_dev_properties[] = {
> > > > >                              ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO),
> > > > >      DEFINE_PROP_BIT(PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_PROP_SHPC, PCIBridgeDev, flags,
> > > > >                      PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_F_SHPC_REQ, true),
> > > > > +    DEFINE_PROP_UUID(COMPAT_PROP_UUID, PCIDevice, uuid, false),
> > > > >      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> > > > > index 40a39f57cb..cb8b3dad2a 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> > > > > @@ -34,12 +34,17 @@
> > > > >  #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> > > > >  #include "qemu/range.h"
> > > > >  #include "qapi/error.h"
> > > > > +#include "qemu/uuid.h"
> > > > >  
> > > > >  /* PCI bridge subsystem vendor ID helper functions */
> > > > >  #define PCI_SSVID_SIZEOF        8
> > > > >  #define PCI_SSVID_SVID          4
> > > > >  #define PCI_SSVID_SSID          6
> > > > >  
> > > > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_SIZEOF             20
> > > > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_CAP_LEN_OFFSET      2
> > > > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_GROUP_ID_OFFSET     4
> > > > > +
> > > > >  int pci_bridge_ssvid_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
> > > > >                            uint16_t svid, uint16_t ssid,
> > > > >                            Error **errp)
> > > > > @@ -57,6 +62,27 @@ int pci_bridge_ssvid_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t 
> > > > > offset,
> > > > >      return pos;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +int pci_bridge_vendor_init(PCIDevice *d, uint8_t offset, Error 
> > > > > **errp)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +    int pos;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    if (qemu_uuid_is_null(&d->uuid)) {
> > > > > +        return 0;
> > > > > +    }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    pos = pci_add_capability(d, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR, offset, 
> > > > > PCI_VENDOR_SIZEOF,
> > > > > +            errp);
> > > > > +    if (pos < 0) {
> > > > > +        return pos;
> > > > > +    }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    pci_set_word(d->config + pos + PCI_VENDOR_CAP_LEN_OFFSET,
> > > > > +            PCI_VENDOR_SIZEOF);
> > > > > +    memcpy(d->config + pos + PCI_VENDOR_GROUP_ID_OFFSET, &d->uuid,
> > > > > +            sizeof(QemuUUID));
> > > > > +    return pos;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  /* Accessor function to get parent bridge device from pci bus. */
> > > > >  PCIDevice *pci_bridge_get_device(PCIBus *bus)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie.h
> > > > > index b71e369703..b4189d0ce3 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie.h
> > > > > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct PCIExpressDevice {
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  
> > > > >  #define COMPAT_PROP_PCP "power_controller_present"
> > > > > +#define COMPAT_PROP_UUID "uuid"
> > > > >  
> > > > >  /* PCI express capability helper functions */
> > > > >  int pcie_cap_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset, uint8_t type,
> > > > 
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Reply via email to