On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:14:19 +0300 Roman Kagan <rka...@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:54:06PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > If we want to extend that to other device types, we can add the field > > in their config space; but I'd rather prefer a more generic "host > > relays config metainformation" approach. > > The problem with this approach is that it's too generic and poorly > scoped. As a result I guess it's likely to take ages to converge. I'd certainly not want to wait for it for this particular issue; however, I think there is value in having this (seeing that at least Open Stack and s390x DPM already make use of such a mechanism.) But we can still revisit this later on. (I'm not too sold on branching out to other device types in general, but there seems to be demand for it.) > > See for instance the discussion on including vm config metadata in qcow2 > images: I think it's similar in scope (or the absense thereof). > > Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
