On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:39:24PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > And as I said, you will need much more spec work to reach the level to which > > features are specified - and note we are not yet happy with how features are > Can you be specific of the work that you are expecting in this v5 version?
I proposed getting rid of attrs_mask/device_admin_caps and instead specify that e.g. feature bits 64 to 95 are reserved for management purposes. Maybe just add a 32 bit register, or maybe "extended features" with a selector and length like mmio and ccw already do, up to you. I think Cornelia likes this suggestion too. This would replace functionality of the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_CAPS_IDENTIFY/VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_CAPS_ACCEPT commands and have the advantage of being generally well specified and understood. Is this acceptable? Or is there a reason the new commands are preferable? -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
