On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 9:39 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:06:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > Jason I think the issue with previous proposals is that they conflict > > > with VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT. We have repeatedly found that giving the > > > driver flexibility in arranging the packet in memory is benefitial. > > > > > > Yes, but I didn't found how it can conflict the any_layout. Device can just > > to not split the header when the layout doesn't fit for header splitting. > > (And this seems the case even if we're using buffers). > > Well spec says: > > indicates to both the device and the driver that no > assumptions were made about framing. > > if device assumes that descriptor boundaries are where > driver wants packet to be stored that is clearly > an assumption.
Yes but what I want to say is, the device can choose to not split the packet if the framing doesn't fit. Does it still comply with the above description? Thanks > > > -- > MST > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
