On Wed, Nov 23 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:51:31AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 22 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 04:25:23PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 20 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > +When \field{status} is VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_EINVAL, >> >> > +the following table describes possible \field{status_qialifier} values: >> >> > +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} >> >> > +\hline >> >> > +Status & Name & Description \\ >> >> > +\hline \hline >> >> > +00h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_Q_INVALID_COMMAND & command error: no >> >> > additional information \\ >> >> >> >> Either 0x00, or decimal (which one is better?) >> > >> > I think I prefer 0x here. And maybe I will add status values in both hex >> > and decimal (I used decimal to be consistent with linux headers but >> > fundamentally what we use most of the time is hex). >> >> Ok. >> >> > >> >> > +\hline >> >> > +01h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_Q_INVALID_OPCODE & unsupported or >> >> > invalid \field{opcode} \\ >> >> > +\hline >> >> > +02h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_Q_INVALID_FIELD & unsupported or >> >> > invalid field within \field{command_specific_data} \\ >> >> > +\hline >> >> > +03h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_Q_INVALID_GROUP & unsupported or >> >> > invalid \field{group_type} was set \\ >> >> >> >> s/was set// >> >> >> >> > +\hline >> >> > +04h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_Q_INVALID_MEM & unsupported or invalid >> >> > \field{group_member_id} was set \\ >> >> >> >> s/was set// >> >> >> >> > +\hline >> >> > +other & - & group administration command error \\ >> >> >> >> Again the question whether this is something that can be defined per >> >> group type. >> > >> > probably - above ones are generic, let's see if we need specific ones. >> > if yes will be easy to add. >> >> I think we want to distinguish between "reserved" (not defined yet, may >> get a meaning later on) and "group type specific" (a group type may use >> it, don't reuse for generic stuff). If we need group type specific >> errors (and don't want a free-for-all), we could go with eg. >> >> 0x05 & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_Q_GROUP_ERR_0 & group type specific error \\ >> >> or so? Do we see any need for that yet? > > Not yet. Then maybe let's make the last line 0x05 - & - & reserved for future use \\ ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org