On Wednesday, 2023-02-15 at 02:53:34 +02, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> On 13/02/2023 14:21, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Thursday, 2023-02-09 at 07:13:48 -05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> @@ -1031,6 +1035,19 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure 
>>> layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>>>           This field exists only if VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET has been
>>>           negotiated. (see \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / 
>>> Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}).
>>>   +\item[\field{admin_queue_index}]
>>> +        The device uses this to report the index of the first 
>>> administration virtqueue.
>>> +        This field is valid only if VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ has been negotiated.
>>> +\item[\field{admin_queue_num}]
>>> +   The device uses this to report the number of the
>>> +   supported administration virtqueues.  Virtqueues with index
>>> +   between \field{admin_queue_index} and (\field{admin_queue_index} +
>>> +   \field{admin_queue_num}) inclusive serve as administration
>>> +   virtqueues.
>>> +   Thus the number of administration virtqueues equals
>>> +   (\field{admin_queue_num} + 1).
>> Really the number of queues is "admin_queue_num + 1"?
>> That seems ... odd.
>
> It's not odd if we'll mention that this is a zero based value.
> MST, can you add it please for the next version ?

The field is called ...num, which makes it seem like a count of things,
when in reality it's the highest index. Perhaps the name could more
accurately reflect the intent?

>
>> 
>>> +   This field is valid only if VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ has been
>>> +   negotiated.
>>>   \end{description}
>>>     \devicenormative{\paragraph}{Common configuration structure
>>> layout}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device
>>> Layout / Common configuration structure layout}
>>> @@ -1117,6 +1134,14 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure 
>>> layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>>>   were used before the queue reset.
>>>   (see \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / 
>>> Virtqueue Reset}).
>>>   +If VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ has been negotiated, and if the driver
>>> +configures any administration virtqueues, the driver MUST
>>> +configure the administration virtqueues using the index
>>> +in the range \field{admin_queue_index} to
>>> +\field{admin_queue_index} + \field{admin_queue_num} inclusive.
>>> +The driver MAY configure less administration virtqueues than
>>> +supported by the device.
>>> +
>>>   \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport 
>>> Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Notification capability}
>>>     The notification location is found using the
>>> VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_NOTIFY_CFG
>>> @@ -7684,6 +7709,15 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved 
>>> Feature Bits}
>>>       \item[VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ(41)] This feature indicates that the
>>> device exposes one or more
>>>     administration virtqueues.
>>> +  At the moment this feature is only supported for devices using
>>> +  \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI
>>> +     Bus}~\nameref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus}
>>> +     as the transport and is reserved for future use for
>>> +     devices using other transports (see
>>> +     \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature 
>>> Bits}
>>> +   and
>>> +   \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature 
>>> Bits} for
>>> +   handling features reserved for future use.
>>>     \end{description}
-- 
Stop the music and go home.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Reply via email to