Currently specification uses virtqueue index and number interchangeably to refer to the virtqueue.
Instead refer to it by its index. Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/163 Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <pa...@nvidia.com> --- changelog: v11->v12: - removed changes related to index - replace number with index - added 'only' to make it more clear that notification has only vq index v9->v10: - replaced queue_select with vqn - used lower case letter for first word in comment v8->v9: - replaced 'named' with 'known' - replaced 'queue number' with 'vq number' v3->v4: - moved note to comment v2->v3: - added comment note for queue_select similar to max_queue_size v0->v1: - new patch --- transport-ccw.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/transport-ccw.tex b/transport-ccw.tex index cb476c7..86272d1 100644 --- a/transport-ccw.tex +++ b/transport-ccw.tex @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ \subsubsection{Guest->Host Notification}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi \end{tabular} When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, -the \field{Notification data} contains the Virtqueue number. +the \field{Notification data} contains the virtqueue index. When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, the value has the following format: -- 2.26.2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org