Currently specification uses virtqueue index and
number interchangeably to refer to the virtqueue.

Instead refer to it by its index.

Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/163
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <pa...@nvidia.com>
---
changelog:
v11->v12:
- removed changes related to index
- replace number with index
- added 'only' to make it more clear that
  notification has only vq index
v9->v10:
- replaced queue_select with vqn
- used lower case letter for first word in comment
v8->v9:
- replaced 'named' with 'known'
- replaced 'queue number' with 'vq number'
v3->v4:
- moved note to comment
v2->v3:
- added comment note for queue_select similar to max_queue_size
v0->v1:
- new patch
---
 transport-ccw.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/transport-ccw.tex b/transport-ccw.tex
index cb476c7..86272d1 100644
--- a/transport-ccw.tex
+++ b/transport-ccw.tex
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ \subsubsection{Guest->Host Notification}\label{sec:Virtio 
Transport Options / Vi
 \end{tabular}
 
 When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated,
-the \field{Notification data} contains the Virtqueue number.
+the \field{Notification data} contains the virtqueue index.
 
 When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated,
 the value has the following format:
-- 
2.26.2


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org

Reply via email to