On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:47:04PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 9:39 AM > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 01:28:40PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > This is not the objective to transport all PCI virtio fields over AQ. > > > Transport VQ commands proposal commands and commands in this proposal > > are just fine the way there without quoting it as "transport". > > > > I mean, it's a transport in a sense of where it will reside in e.g. > > linux virtio stack - below virtio core. > > We don't save much code there by reusing the same register layout of legacy > > pci. > > But let's at least make this feature complete, and then we'll see whether > > it is > > cleaner to reuse legacy layout or build a new one. > > I don't follow your comment about "this feature complete". > When you say _this_, it means the feature proposed in this patch of > supporting legacy over PCI VFs? > > If so, anything missing in this proposal?
I think I commented at least on what I see as missing is first of all a need to support INT#x emulation since level interrupts are I think not supported for VFs. right? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
