On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:49:19PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 5:12 PM > > > > > Nah, we don't need a "break randomly unless it's a full moon and you cross > > your > > heart three times" mode. If you are going to implement support for legacy > > emulation implement it in a way that either predictably works or predictably > > refuses to load. > > It works with same level of predictability as current legacy interface > definition for x86_64 platform when msix in guest is supported. > > Supporting intx we discussed to deal incrementally after this.
Only thing I am worried is that we do not decide to go back to msix vector after all because of the shifting offset of device config. As I said, split device and transport configs to separate commands rather than just using offset and then I think it's ok to defer INTx work a bit. Though I feel it's valuable and will help us move towards more important goals like LM. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
