> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 1:20 PM
> > It is reused, but it doesnt come for free. > > Do you want to re-consider AQ notify query command? > > Or continue as proposed in v6? > > > If we can't just make it come for free then maybe > VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_LEGACY_NOTIFY_CFG is better, we can just list the number in > the common section and then link to the description in the new section. > How is it better? It requires burning more bytes. Is it better because it is self contained? > I also feel we want ability to have such a capability in the owner too. > Would prefer including it now though I guess we can add it as an extension. Re-opening the past discussion.. amazing. :) Why? How is it different and better than querying over AQ? I see the AQ is better than group owner and group member specific cap. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org