> From: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 11:46 PM > > Having it in the config space, then a type agnostic provisioning through > config > space + feature bits just works fine. > Provisioning is far simpler thing to do in device specific way than asking device to store this value in onchip area which is rarely accessed. There are many fields of many features for 1.4 are discussed including this one. All of these capabilities just cannot be stored in config space. > If we move it only via cvq, we need device specific provisioning interface.
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v19] virtio-net: support inner ... Jason Wang
- [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v19] virtio-net: support i... Parav Pandit
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v19] virtio-net: suppo... Jason Wang
- [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v19] virtio-net: s... Parav Pandit
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v19] virtio-ne... Jason Wang
- RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v19] ... Parav Pandit
- [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [PATCH v... Michael S. Tsirkin
- [virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment] RE: [PAT... Parav Pandit
- [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] RE: ... Michael S. Tsirkin
- [virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment]... Parav Pandit
- [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comm... Michael S. Tsirkin
- [virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-... Parav Pandit