On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:12:41PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 7:37 PM > > > > True, for us, at this point we do not have plan to expose virtio switch > > > device > > because users are not blocked on it. > > > > If someone does though I see no reason not to - we have a variety of > > devices, > > switch would be just another one. The motivation would be the usual one for > > virtio - so there's one generic driver. > > > Sure. > > > > > Re:queues - it's not by chance that we have multiple admin queues. > > > > So driver can dedicate one queue to filtering commands if that's > > > > felt to be important. > > > > > > > Admin queue currently do not send non admin command of the device. > > > Would you propose admin queue for something else also for rtc or console > > > or > > cryto device and indicate its role so device can understand what is coming > > to it. > > > > Well, I guess this switch has group members as its "ports" so maybe that > > makes > > it like an admin command. Again it's all up in the air too much to be able > > to > > judge. > > Flowvq is needed for non switch device too. > It has advanced to design stage now, its sad that you are no following it.
Frankly I didn't even understand that's what this is talking about. > Anyways, flow operations is not a admin command. > I don't find admin queue suitable for self unless we modify its definitions a > lot. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
